Correspondingly, impulsivity is associated with poor academic achievement and impaired psychometric performance on reasoning tasks ( Schweizer, 2002 Lozano et al., 2014). Although, spontaneous actions may be adaptive, for example when the matter is of little importance or when there is little time to make a decision ( Dickman, 1990), high levels of impulsivity often result in negative consequences. Examples include a preference toward obtaining immediate gratification over a delayed (yet ultimately more profitable) outcome, making “snap decisions” before evaluating available information, or having difficulty waiting one’s turn, withholding a reaction, or aborting an initiated motor response ( Daruna and Barnes, 1993 Moeller et al., 2001). Impulsivity describes a set of behaviors characterized by relative dominance of spontaneity over consideration. This novel insight enhances our understanding of impulsive behaviors. Interoceptive sensibility was only associated with negative emotions component.Ĭonclusion: Our findings support the proposal that risk-taking and impulsivity represent distinct constructs that are differentially affected by current mood states. This separation was further highlighted by their relationship with the current emotional state: positive affect was associated with increased risk-taking tendencies and risky decision-making, while negative emotions were related to heightened impulsivity measures. These were separate from measures associated with impulsivity, both trait (negative and positive urgency, premeditation, perseverance) and behavioral (delayed discounting and reflection impulsivity). Namely, sensation-seeking, reward sensitivity and probability discounting reflected risk-taking. Results: We observed a clear separation of measures used, both trait and behavioral. Data were interrogated using principal component analysis, correlations and regression analyses to test mutual relationships between personality traits, interoceptive sensibility, mood state and impulsive behaviors. Method: 574 (121 males age 18–45) individuals completed self-report personality measures of impulsivity, reward sensitivity, punishment avoidance as well as interoceptive sensibility, undertook a mood assessment and performed a set of cognitive tasks: delay discounting (temporal impulsivity), probability discounting (risk-taking), and reflection impulsivity task. Here, we examined how personality traits of behavioral tendencies, interoceptive sensibility as well as transient mood states predict behavioral performance on impulsivity and risk-taking tasks. It is, therefore, crucial to understand the factors which contribute to impulsive behaviors. Objectives: The consequences of impulsive decisions and actions represent a major source of concern to the health and well-being of individuals and society. 4Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |